Benchmarks
This page includes some benchmarks comparing Sandhole and competing solutions.
Methodology
- Test service: sandhole-benchmark/service in release profile, using AES-256-GCM.
- Test client: sandhole-benchmark/measure in release profile.
- Service-to-proxy latency:
--- sandhole.com.br ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29131ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 141.265/144.842/150.421/2.243 ms
- Client-to-proxy latency: Same as above.
- Measurements: Two cold runs, then average + standard deviation of five results.
Results
| sandhole v0.6.0 | sish v2.19.0 | Speedup | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTPS GET 50MB | 9s 351ms ± 193ms | 10s 500ms ± 1s 110ms | 1.123x |
| HTTPS GET 100MB | 17s 264ms ± 342ms | 13s 837ms ± 1s 512ms | 0.802x |
| HTTPS POST 50MB | 11s 252ms ± 180ms | 12s 677ms ± 305ms | 1.126x |
- At smaller transfer sizes, Sandhole is faster.
- Latency is much more consistent in Sandhole.